Davos 2009: Newspapers Remain Dead

But journalism is alive and well.
Lionel Barber of the FT masterfully moderated the 2009 installment in the long-running Davos debate on the health of the media entitled "Fragility in the Fourth Estate." Joining me on the panel were Steve Forbes of the eponymous magazine; Jonathan Nelson of Providence Equity Partners the media-focused buyout firm; Shobhana Bhartia of the Indian Parliament and the Hindustan Times; and John Graham of Fleishman-Hillard the global PR firm.
While we broke little new ground the discussion was uncharacteristically animated for a 9:00am audience. While Luddites and Refusniks remain there seems to be growing acceptance of the point I and others have been making for years: Newsprint is an output device not an end in itself. What matters is quality journalism which can and does thrive in multiple media.
There are several advantages of paper: it is light to carry highly legible and can be folded written upon and read on the train or in the small tiled room. However paper has its limitations: it is relatively expensive must be physically delivered is less environmentally friendly than digital bits and cannot be easily searched or processed. This latter point has resulted in the near destruction of the print newspaper model as classified advertising has fled online.
While these trends are not universal (Shobhana reminded us that newspapers in India continue to thrive) the combination of these structural challenges with the tremendous cyclical pressures being experienced in most markets should not make one optimistic about the future of the print-only model.
Instead of lamenting that the Fourth Estate is dead we should celebrate the innovations of the current age that can now be applied to telling the story such as blogs wikis IPTV social media the mobile web Kindle electronic ink etc.. For those who can make the leap while not abandoning their journalistic values new audiences await.

A Drive in the English Countryside

One of the privileges of being Chief Executive of Thomson Reuters is that I get to meet some very interesting people and have access to events and places that I don’t flatter myself into believing would be available to me otherwise. One such event was an invitation to lunch this past Sunday with Gordon Brown and his family at Chequers the country retreat of British prime ministers.
So my family and I dutifully drove out of London into the Buckinghamshire countryside. We had received quite detailed directions from 10 Downing Street; however either due to our own navigational incompetence or the mysterious windings of English country lanes we found ourselves totally lost and running late in the vicinity of Chequers. Overcoming for a moment my usual male reluctance to ask anyone for directions I thought I had hit upon a brilliant plan. I stopped a nice looking Englishman in high Wellies walking his golden retriever and asked for directions to "Chequers . "
The man cheerfully responded that we were truly in luck. He said that he happened to work at Chequers and proceeded to give us incredibly detailed directions to the location. As we followed them precisely we kept congratulating ourselves on our perspicacious choice of guide and soon arrived at "Chequers."
Unfortunately the place to which we were sent was not the Prime Minister’s baronial country home but the "Chequers Inn" a quaint pub some five miles further away. It turned out that our guide was not on the Prime Minister’s staff but rather the local barkeep.
We then embarrassedly retraced our route and after a further few inquiries found our way to the real Chequers more or less on time. Given the weighty issues the PM and his staff must grapple with these days I was happy to bring a bit of American navigational levity to the occasion.

A Special Guest

We have hosted a lot of important visitors at Thomson Reuters headquarters. Over the years we have had Prime Ministers Heads of State Royalty Chancellors and Treasury Secretaries Central Bank Governors the Secretary General of the UN Ambassadors and a steady stream of valued customers and partners. However none has been as important as the special guest we had in our Times Square global headquarters in New York this past New Year’s Eve.
Sixteen year-old Kelsi from Minnesota had a wish and the Make-a-Wish Foundation had the friends to make it happen. This intrepid leukemia patient watched the ball drop in Times Square from the safety and warmth of the Thomson Reuters boardroom and was treated to a special party for her family. There are bigger and more strategic events that will take place in that room this year but none will make us feel as good.

Obama II — Response to Comments

Unsurprisingly my prior Obama post (Obama and The City on the Hill) attracted significant comment. I agree with the reply that "Obama is colorless." This is what is truly historic. America has advanced to the point at which an African American can be elected because he is the most qualified candidate and not because of the color of his skin.

To get to this point the Nation first had to leave behind a past in which a black man could never have been elected because of the color of his skin and then equally importantly a period in which black candidates put themselves forward largely because of the color of their skin (e.g. Rev. Jessie Jackson or Rev. Al Sharpton).

Racism has not unfortunately been eliminated. But Obama is truly the first "post racial" President.

One other writer asked me to comment on President-elect Obama’s cabinet choices. Without getting into a post-by-post analysis I must say that I am very impressed with the quality of the appointees. Our future President’s ability to choose motivate and then listen to such high quality advisers bodes well for his administration. My only worry is the managerial effort it will take to lead this high-octane cabinet.

Obama and the City on the Hill

It is a new America to which I return after a long election week’s trip to Asia. This is not a political opinion but a historic one.
For those of us who grew up in the 1960s even grew up white in America it was the decade of the epic civil rights struggles. Dr King Thurgood Marshall Rosa Parks and others led a peaceful revolution so that African Americans could secure their already constitutionally guaranteed right to sit in any seat on a public bus or at a lunch counter study at the university of their choice or most importantly this week exercise their right to vote.
One election does not atone for hundreds of years of slavery a century of Jim Crow discrimination or literally millions of individual incidents of racial prejudice and bias – the job not offered the apartment not rented or simply the taxi cab that did not stop. However it is truly remarkable that the self-righting system at the heart of the American spirit could in Spike Lee’s words "do the right thing."
President Obama will have many challenges including the economic issues I have written about here lately (see blog post Towards a New Capitalism) but also national security international war and peacekeeping and social justice issues like affordable healthcare. However President Obama also represents an important catharsis for America. How many of us ever really thought or even dared hope that a man who describes himself as a "mutt" could be elected the most powerful man on earth?
For some like me the feeling is one of elation – a burden lifted a civil war finally ended as Tom Friedman has recently written a 150 years on. Free free at last. For others there will be questions of experience and competence and for others still since racism has not been banished from every heart by simple majority vote hatred. But for all of us there should be hope and restored faith in the American dream. For the concept of America well beyond the physical dimensions of the nation state is not a monopoly owned only by US citizens.
That the City on the Hill can still shine brightly and nobly is a reason for celebration.

The Elegant Universe

Those who know me well know that my reading list infrequently departs from fiction as I find literature provides a healthy and spiritually fulfilling counterbalance to a professional life deeply rooted in business prose. When I do so depart it is usually into some realm of science (see blog post Strange Loops). For those interested some of my favorite authors of fiction are listed under the tab About Tom accessible from the home page.
I have just finished another great book of ideas on the grandest of themes The Elegant Universe by Professor Brian Greene of Columbia. For those of you who skipped 20th Century Physics in college or those like me who need a good refresher course on Einstein’s theories of relativity and then a fantastic journey on everything that has come since (from quantum mechanics through string theory) this book is for you. But be forewarned: even if you skip the detailed notes the text can be challenging.
Here is the prize:
[T]hrough superstring theory and its evolution into M-theory a cogent framework for merging quantum mechanics general relativity and the strong weak and electromagnetic forces has finally emerged.
The universe which emerges from these new theories consists of:
[L]oops of strings and oscillating globules uniting all creation into vibrational patterns that are meticulously executed in a universe with numerous hidden dimensions capable of undergoing extreme contortions in which their spatial fabric tears apart and then repairs itself.
If this sounds exciting to you I have the book for you but light beach reading it is not.

Towards a New Capitalism

"Well here’s another nice mess you’ve gotten me into Ollie." So might Stan Laurel summarize the position of the average citizen in the global financial crisis. In a similar vein government officials legislators and regulators around the world are busy pointing the finger reminding us of the terribly important speech they gave three years ago of the seminal letter that they wrote warning of the coming problems in exact detail or how their one warning of "irrational exuberance" should temper a multi-year policy of inflating the bubble.
I don’t know enough of the facts to apportion blame and in any case it is not something I find particularly constructive as there are always many volunteers for this duty informed or not. Instead I focus here on what may be part of the solution – on how we might begin to go about rebuilding the economy. I write from a US perspective but many of the initiatives would work in any economy.
Some commentators have declared the "death of capitalism" or the equally fatuous "Marx was right." I believe neither to be correct. Capitalism or free market economics does not and need not mean no government and no regulation. Only in the extremely oversimplified world of good vs. evil or black vs. white need the global economy be divided between socialism on the one hand and a complete laissez faire capitalism on the other. While the "War on Terror" and much recent economic policy has seemed to reflect just such a Manichean world calm analysis suggests that government can play a constructive regulatory role within the context of an otherwise free market. Ironically over the last six weeks the US Government has intervened in a more direct fashion in the economy nationalizing banks and preparing to bail-out entire industries than many "Big Government" proponents have ever dared suggest.
So once the financial system is stabilized and credit markets can return to their primary lending function there should and I believe there will be a major overhaul of the US financial regulatory landscape. Much of the current legislative framework dates from the 1930s and most subsequent rulemaking has just been layered on top (eg 1970s tender offer rules bolted onto 1934 Act). It is also high time to sort out the regulatory alphabet soup of SEC CFTC FED OTS FDIC and their myriad state counterparts.
However before we create a new and more effective regulatory framework for Wall Street (which can involve less but better regulation and fewer regulatory bodies but ones with clearer mandates) we need to revive Main Street. At this point a painful recession lasting 12 to 18 months seems unavoidable. Each time we tried to avoid the harsh medicine before (e.g. bursting of tech bubble asian crisis) we simply reinflated a new bubble (in this case primarily housing but also energy commodities). This simply stored up the problems for a later day but I believe there are good policy decisions that can still be made which will shorten and lessen the impact of this global recession.
First it is very good timing that the US will elect a new President this week. Regardless of who wins (remember as CEO of Thomson Reuters I keep my political loyalties private) there is a chance for a new start. I would recommend that prior to even the inauguration in January the President invite (forcefully) the entire Congress to a special weekend offsite meeting. They can all go the Greenbrier Hotel in West Virginia which was chosen in the 1950s as the secure location to which the seat of government would move in the event of a nuclear emergency – we have one now but of a different making. At this meeting the President should call on members of both parties to sacrifice for the national good and lay aside partisan politics for the remainder of the year (I am an optimist not a fantasist to believe it could be permanent).
Once the new administration and Congress were in place they should supplement the huge amount of monetary stimulus that has been applied with an ambitous fiscal stimulus plan – a New Deal for the 21st Century. Sure we have a terrible budget deficit and yes such a plan will make it worse over the short- to mid-term but we need to substitute governmental demand for the consumer and corporate demand that will be lacking until we emerge from recession. So for example if the automobile industry is in terminal decline don’t just throw good money after bad why not pre-order 25000 Volt electric vehicles and pay up-front – at $40k per car that would be a $1billion injection. A drop in the bucket perhaps and more seriously a potential misallocation of capital but it would do more to keep real workers in their jobs.
The current administration seems to have only a single destination for fiscal stimulus: large military programs many of which appeal more to members of Congress than to career military leaders. The new President might direct Federal spending to two large and needy infrastructure programs. First the Nation’s highways bridges tunnels ports and railways and second the digital highway. The US Interstate System is showing its age and the country seems to have skipped the era of fast trains like the Japanese Bullet or French TGV entirely. Meanwhile in the digital economy while Korea Japan and others build-out 10gb true broadband networks the US still defines "broadband" as 256kb.
It does not take a genius to figure out that digital and physical highways coupled with significant investments in educating a future workforce and keeping them healthy are key to not only stimulating a return to growth but also long-term economic prosperity. Will these investments add to Federal deficits? Of course but at least these are investments (if executed well) and not just spending. I believe the American electorate is not maniacally anti-tax or anti-government – it is reasonably enough anti tax with no return on the money spent and anti bad government. The genius of the Founding Fathers was not to resign themselves and the Nation in perpetuity to a small government because all of our leaders could be assumed to be incompetent but to give the power to the electorate to choose a President Congress and state governments that would govern wisely.
It is high-time – perhaps the perfect time – that we fulfilled this legacy.

Response to Comments

Unsurprisingly there has been a lot of comment on my post "The Great Repricing." Since the original post Congress has now passed the rescue bill and there are some signs of stability appearing in the banking world (viz Wells Fargo’s unsupported bid for Wachovia); however the credit markets remain all but closed and I believe banks will need to recapitalize their balance sheets beyond the sale of bad assets under the TARP legislation.

Below I reply to one commentator who requested specific responses in bold.

Positiveskew said:

Dear Tom

I would love to know your view on these (and probably rank them in order of being the worst culprit in the genesis of this mess)

a. Too-low-for-too-long interest rates. Actor: Alan Greenspan

Not fatal in itself. With developments like the Yen carry trade and huge foreign dollar reserves it could be argued that conventional monetary policy no longer could cool the economy.

b. Sleeping on watch as publicly traded banks built up ginormous leverages. Actor: Chris Cox of the SEC.
It has been too long since I have practiced securities law to give you a definitive view here (bank lawyers invited to comment). My sense is that this is more an issue of broker dealers not being subject to the same regulatory regime as (say) bank holding companies. Thus the SEC lacked some of the tools that the Fed or FDIC possessed.

c. Utter dereliction of duty by the Credit Rating Agencies in correctly assessing risk of the CDO/CDS/MBS instruments. Actors: Moody’s S&P Fitch (some of these are competitors to Thomson Reuters’ business so I will understand should you want to refrain from commenting)
I just think these services were totally outgunned by investment banks. The systemic bias of credit ratings paid by the issuer or sponsoring bank also contributed to the problem.

d. The toxic derivatives being OTC rather than Exchange Traded. Actors: Capital Market policy makers .
I don’t think the OTC trading of instruments such as CDS was fatal in and of itself. As long as there is an effective settlement system as is the case in most FX trading OTC markets alone are not to blame.

Soccer vs. Footie

Although our family recently moved from London to New York one aspect of my life has remained constant: Pacing the sidelines at my son’s weekend Soccer games. I don’t know about Sarah Palin’s family but in mine and most of the others I see each weekend on both sides of the Atlantic the Soccer Dads outnumber the Soccer Moms by about three to one.
There are however a number of key differences between the "Footie" in England and Soccer in the US. First it must be sadly admitted is the quality of play. In London Walter’s polyglot teammates were Dutch Italian German Mexican English and even expat American but they played beautifully coached by every parent’s dream of the perfect coach-hero. Throngs of tourists would stop to watch these eight-year olds play in the shadow of Kensington Palace. Back in New York it must be admitted that the skills of the sons do not rise to the enthusiasm of the fathers. Passing is unheard of (except quixotically across the mouth of the goal) player positions are only indicative of where these free-roaming electrons might wish to start play and all eight players seem often to be playing out a pantomime of the gravitational force by converging into one dense black hole around the ball.
There is at least one aspect in which the Americans have it over the Brits: game organization. First signing-up for one of the leagues in New York is about as easy as applying for a US visa in Kandahar. Once the hapless dad has navigated this online maze comes myriad health forms and litigation releases a match schedule that can be downloaded into multiple PDA formats and near-hourly emails instructing the family as to what type of half-time snack (orange sections cut into eights longitudinally no doughnuts or candy until after the game etc.). Never has so much been organized by so many for so few.
Finally comes game day and one other major difference becomes apparent from the sidelines: there is not an umbrella in sight.

The Great Repricing

Running Thomson Reuters provides me a ringside seat on the global economy. A huge proportion of the world’s trading in stocks bonds foreign currencies and other instruments pass through our systems every day. In addition our 2600 journalists provide not only a running account of market movements but also provide the context and analysis behind these developments.
In this blog however I provide my personal perspective. I cannot wholly separate from the person at work and my day job certainly provides a special vantage point but I do not here speak for the company. In addition given the commitment of Thomson Reuters to preserving the independence freedom from bias and impartiality required by the Reuters Trust Principles I avoid political opinions – although I have strong ones personally.
So I think we came very close to the abyss last week. The Sunday night bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers was destined to get the week off to a bad start despite the timely acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America. The mid-week bailout of AIG avoided another specific set of problems but by Thursday the money markets had totally locked up certain money funds had breached the near sacred $1.00 per share threshold and even well-run investment banks found they could no longer finance their trading operations despite not holding the toxic exposures that brought down Lehman AIG and others.
What was needed was a systemic solution – a solution that was audacious enough and comprehensive enough and yes expensive enough to permit the very interwoven global financial system to begin rebuilding its broken and frayed strands. Although the final shape of the federal bailout plan is still being developed as I write it looks like the penny has dropped in Washington and we have moved away from bank-by-bank bandaids to a comprehensive response. Judging by the stock markets’ reaction on Thursday and Friday there is growing confidence that the crisis phase of the Great Repricing may be receding. I label the period commencing with the failure of the Bear Stearns funds in Summer 2007 and probably extending for at least another 12 months from today as the "Great Repricing" because we are witnessing an unprecedented repricing of risk and a deleveraging of most portfolios
One of the attractions of writing history rather than blogging is that you can generally wait to see what happens before writing. That is always the safer choice and usually yields the best analysis but in these posts I take up the challenge of writing instant history. So here goes. I think was came close to the edge last week; I think the proposed federal bailout fund is a sensible policy response to an unprecedented set of risks; I think it will work; and I think we will all be paying the price for years to come.
While I am focused on historians they often observe that great empires (think Roman or British) ultimately fail not as a result of a decisive military loss but because their powerful economies eventually become over-extended. If this is true the US economy will need to be re-invented to avoid a similar fate for the last super-power. I hope our next President is up to the task.